Behavioral calibration map
The STARs in 03 are opening moves from the master story bank — lived Lucid/Volvo/O stories, not theme-sliced slogans. Graded behavioral/ entries are longer Principal versions. All behavioral files stay practice-status: draft until I pass timed mocks with private notes.
Map (this order)
| Kit STAR | Graded behavioral | Resume / bank anchor | My job |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 — EDI platform | 04 Payments/EDI | 20k suppliers; LangGraph router + model router; shared state + RAG/vectors; Kafka to microservices; 34 specialists; $10M + $7M net; 200→25 | Don’t mash with 10→2. Don’t guess vector product / model SKUs. |
| 2 — Kafka MSK | 06 Influence without authority | $1M+; 4-week pre-prod; infra director converted | VERIFY rebalance mechanics before cooperative-sticky |
| 3 — Lucid payments | 04 (payments half) | Stripe + Klarna/Giropay/iDEAL; GIB Gulf; Chase ACH; 9+ US/India/APAC | CONFIRM retry/fallback/reconciliation |
| 4 — Governance | 07 Failed bet + 03 Security if portfolio-only | Lucid control plane; HITL 8%→2.3%; public AegisAI is O | Don’t claim GitHub binary ran inside Lucid |
| 5 — Access-aware RAG | Design answers + eval story | Lucid P + ERAG O | Same P/O split; 3-pt / 99.6% are CONFIRM if legal flinches |
| Volvo 0→6 | 09 Mentoring | 9 interns 100% convert; 20% revenue contributed | OPEN: named Sweden-HQ fight — do not invent |
| Staffing 10→2 | 01 | Separate from 200→25 | Don’t mix in one sentence |
| Peer conflict | 08 | SAP directors vs owned EDI | Volvo HQ still OPEN |
| FinOps | 02 | Portfolio-safe | Keep O unless Lucid FinOps is confirmed |
| 0→1 ambiguity (O) | 05 Content Factory | ACF publish scope | Not a Lucid substitute |
FDE tilt: same STARs + Why FDE. Not a second career story.
Calibration protocol
As candidate
- Fill CONFIRM rows in the evidence bank.
- For each mapped behavioral: write 30s / 2min / 8min versions.
- Blind timed mock — no notes.
- Only then mentally promote off
draft.
How I’ll be judged
They listen for:
- Specific decision + discarded alternative
- Metric with provenance (or honest “I won’t invent”)
- Setback + fix (silent ASN, HITL 8%→2.3%)
- Org reach beyond my team — a standard someone else reused
- No blending of open demos into employer production
If I sound like a README, I fail. If I sound like an operator with scars, I pass.
How I open a STAR (so it doesn’t sound like a resume)
Here’s the decision I made, the option I discarded, and what broke when we were wrong. Then the number — and how we measured it. If I can’t name the discarded option, I’m not ready to tell this story.
I do not open with headcount, title, or “I led a team of…” unless they asked about leadership. I do not mix the public repo into the Lucid sentence.
Questions that will get asked
EDI / 200→25 — STAR 1
20k suppliers. Cheaper vendor was the tempting path. We built the layer. Onboarding 200 to 25. $10M licensing gone, $7M net. SAP directors pushed back; I kept invoice gen on SAP and shipped anyway.
10→2 staffing — behavioral/01
Different workflow from 200→25. Eight roles went away — I won’t call that redeployed if it wasn’t. Architecture was mine. Employment decisions sat with the business.
Influence without authority — STAR 2
Infra director, Confluent, four-week pre-prod, he presented the win. Spoken draft: Q9.
A bet that failed / what broke — silent ASN, then autonomy→HITL. Q7 · Q10.
Disagreement with peers — SAP directors. Volvo HQ is OPEN — I will not invent it.
Production incident — the ASN/SAP miss is the incident. Q14.
Minimum before the next onsite
- STAR 1 (EDI) + STAR 2 (Kafka) fluent, including silent ASN and “what if pre-prod failed”
- Dual-UI (internal vs supplier portal) said out loud twice — it’s new muscle
- Kafka rebalance paragraph verified against memory or dropped
- Behavioral 04 + 06 timed once each
- Mentoring story uses Volvo nine interns + one private mentee detail
- Do not hand the resume PDF until projected $5–7M / $8–9M is gone
Related
- STAR pack
- Private evidence bank
- Evidence ledger:
docs/CANDIDATE_EVIDENCE_LEDGER.md