Coding and language refresh
Live loops still include coding or practical drills. Competency matrix scores coding ~6/10. I fix that with practice, not more architecture essays. This runs in parallel with north-star warmth — I don’t park coding until chapter 4.
Honest stack (LOCKED)
| Surface | Proof | What I say |
|---|---|---|
| Python / FastAPI / LangGraph | Lucid AI + public spine | Primary daily AI stack |
| Java / Spring Boot | Volvo ecommerce microservices | Expert OOP / enterprise services — I lead with this on Java-preferring JDs |
| TypeScript / React / Next.js | Portfolio UIs | Full-stack delivery |
| Kafka / eventing | Lucid MSK migration | Distributed systems depth |
| Go | Not primary | “I haven’t been day-to-day Go recently. I read it and can contribute on platform surfaces within weeks. My distributed-systems bar is proven in Java and Python.” Never fake fluency. |
14-day micro-plan
Days 1–3 — Staff+ coding bar
From coding/, timed 45–60 min, no answer sheet:
Pass bar: correct + tests narrated + complexity aloud + when to stop.
Days 4–6 — Platform-flavored
Days 7–9 — FDE / Applied practical
- Practical FDE coding drills
- One SQL narration drill (window functions / funnel) against a toy schema
Days 10–12 — Java surface (Intuit-class JDs)
Re-open one Volvo-shaped story: Spring service boundary, idempotent payment/webhook handler sketch on a whiteboard. Java syntax can be rusty. Structure matters.
Days 13–14 — Go literacy (Rivian-class JDs) — optional, smart
Not fluency theater:
- Read idiomatic Go error handling + contexts
- Rewrite one small Python helper (token bucket) in Go once
- Stop at “I can navigate and pair,” not “I’m a Go expert”
Weekly maintenance (whole arc)
| Cadence | Action |
|---|---|
| 3× / week in war room; 1× / week later | One timed coding problem |
| Before a Java-prefer JD | One Spring/Java whiteboard |
| Before a Go-prefer JD | One Go read + honesty line |
Use Practice Arena when rubrics exist; otherwise timer + rubber-duck.
How I talk while coding (so it doesn’t sound like LeetCode theater)
- Clarify the contract — inputs, failure modes, what “done” means.
- Brute force aloud if I need it. Then the structure I’d actually ship.
- Complexity once. Tests as I go — not a speech at the end.
- Staff+ stop line: concurrency, idempotency, or a tenant/keying bug. Then I stop adding features.
I’m going to lock the interface, get a correct version, then make the cache/limiter/consumer safe under concurrency. If we have time I’ll add the Staff+ piece — I won’t gold-plate a rate limiter into a platform.
If I’m stuck:
I’m going to say the brute-force version out loud so we don’t sit in silence, then I’ll name the bottleneck and fix that. I’d rather ship a correct O(n) with tests than freeze hunting a clever one.
If they switch languages mid-problem:
I can finish this in Python or TypeScript cleanly. If you need Java, I’ll sketch the same structure — syntax may be rusty, the concurrency and idempotency calls won’t be. I won’t pretend I’m as fast in Go.
SQL narration (FDE-style):
I’ll start with the grain of the table, then the window or funnel, then the null and late-event cases. I won’t invent a warehouse I haven’t seen.
What I’d say if they ask language fit
Daily drivers are Python and TypeScript for agent platforms. Java and Spring are real history from Volvo-scale ecommerce — I can lead that conversation. I won’t fake day-to-day Go. If this team is Go-primary, I’ll be honest about ramp, and I’ll show the distributed-systems bar from Java and Python.
Related
- Accept / reject rubric
- Staff+ coding in the study UI:
/c/coding/