Playbook / Principal search path / Resume and public footprint

Resume and public footprint

Do these before the next HM screen. Each row is a cleanup item from resume vs evidence ledger. I don’t wait for chapter 3 to start asking AI-platform recommenders — that warmth runs in parallel.


Checklist

#FixTodayTarget wordingStatus
1Experience years“19 years”; FTE timeline from 2009 visibleKeep 19 years; add pre-2009 internship lines (employer/dates/role) so the math is auditable[x] count locked · [ ] internships listed on PDF
2Lucid datesPDF: “Nov 2023 – Aug 2026”; still FTE, looking outNov 2023–present everywhere public; looking-out private until disclosed[x] status locked · [ ] PDF date line updated
3Substack count“18 essays”Live RSS count on interview week[ ]
4GoogleEasy to misread as Google employee“Apple/Google client work via Sparity” everywhere[ ]
5BS school name“Jawaharlal Nehru University, Anantapur”Exact diploma name (often JNTU Anantapur)[ ]
6Open vs LucidResume keeps “Designed AegisAI” Lucid bullet (no rewrite)Spoken: Lucid required gateway/HITL/audit; public AegisAI is O inspectable pattern — not Lucid’s GitHub binary[x] resume decision locked · [ ] rehearse spoken line
7Catalog numbers“12 live / 18 repos”Recount from one canonical source before each screen[ ]
8LinkedIn headlineMay still read generalPaste the pitch-page headline (governed agents / Sr Staff AI Platform / Founding)[ ]
9LinkedIn FeaturedWeak / mobile-eraFeatured: hire + AegisAI + technical-review[ ]
10RecommendationsiOS/mobile quotes dominateAsk 3 AI-platform recommenders — referrals[ ]
11EDI / savings wordingPDF: “projected $5–7M” and/or “$8–9M” / rolled-up “$10M+”Spoken + new PDF: $10M TrueCommerce licensing eliminated (realized) + $7M annual net after platform costs; Kafka $1M+ separate. Do not mash.[x] spoken locked 2026-08-13 · [ ] PDF source still stale

One-paragraph resume summary (paste)

Principal-depth AI architect (Sr. Staff title at Lucid, Principal-scope work) with 19 years shipping platforms (including documented pre-2009 internships). Last three years: governed agent systems — runtime policy/HITL/audit, access-aware RAG, eval-gated CI. At Lucid (Nov 2023–present) led enterprise AI 0→1: in-house EDI/supplier platform for 20,000+ suppliers (3 orchestrators, 34 specialists, dual RBAC UIs) — $10M TrueCommerce licensing eliminated, $7M annual net — plus Kafka/MSK ($1M+) and multi-rail payments (Stripe, GIB, Chase ACH). Public inspectable spine: AegisAI, Enterprise RAG, VAP, golden-eval CI — principles aligned with production work, not a claim those repos ran inside Lucid. Earlier: Volvo multi-market ecommerce (Java/Spring), Kaiser HIPAA platform leadership, Sparity Apple/Google client engagements.

LOCKED 2026-08-13: spoken savings = $10M licensing eliminated + $7M net (realized). Still do on PDF: date → present; add internship rows; replace “projected $5–7M” / “$8–9M” mush.


LinkedIn About (short)

Same paragraph + CTA:

Open to Sr Staff / Principal AI Platform and Founding roles. Technical review: https://venkat-ai.com/technical-review

FDE / Applied flavor is a sentence, not a second About: discovery → wedge → HITL for irreversible tools. Same person.


Spoken lines I use when the PDF is still dirty

“Were you a Google employee?”

No. Apple and Google were client engagements through Sparity. I don’t claim a Google W-2 I don’t have.

“Are you still at Lucid?”

Yes. November 2023 through present. I’m looking, confidentially.

“Your resume says 19 years but I only see 2009.”

The count includes pre-2009 internships. I’ll get those rows on the PDF. Until then I can name dates and employers — I’m not going to let the math look like a trick.


Spoken line I rehearse for AegisAI

At Lucid I required gateway, HITL, and audit for agent side effects. The public AegisAI repo encodes that control-plane pattern so a panel can inspect it. I’m not claiming Lucid ran that binary.


What I will not “fix” by inventing

  • Fake P95 / SLO tables
  • Fake Google employment
  • Claiming public AegisAI is Lucid’s production binary
  • Softening 10→2 into “redeployed” if eliminations happened